Tuesday, August 31, 2010

Paper: Resampling and the Detection of LSB Matching in Colour Bitmaps

Andrew D. Ker
Oxford University Computing Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford, England

Security, Steganography, and Watermarking of Multimedia Contents VII,
San Jose, CA, USA., 17-20 January 2005, pp. 1-15

(Original SPIE Digital Library Link)

Abstract

We consider the problem of detecting the presence of hidden data in colour bitmap images. Like straightforward LSB Replacement, LSB Matching (which randomly increments or decrements cover pixels to embed the hidden data in the least significant bits) is attractive because it is extremely simple to implement. It has proved much harder to detect than LSB Replacement because it does not introduce the same asymmetries into the stego image. We expand our recently-developed techniques for the detection of LSB Matching in grayscale images into the full-colour case. Not everything goes through smoothly but the end result is much improved detection, especially for cover images which have been stored as JPEG files, even if subsequently resampled. Evaluation of steganalysis statistics is performed using a distributed steganalysis project. Because evaluation of reliability of detectors for LSB Matching is limited, we begin with a review of the previously-known detectors.

1. INTRODUCTION: LSB STEGANOGRAPHY
1.1. LSB Replacement and LSB Matching
1.2. Detectors for LSB Matching
1.3. Evaluation Methodology

2. DETECTORS BASED ON CLOSE COLOUR PAIRS
2.1. Westfeld’s Detector
2.2. Performance Analysis

3. HISTOGRAM CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTION DETECTORS
3.1. Harmsen’s HCF COM Detectors
3.2. Performance Analysis

4. NOVEL DETECTORS
4.1. HCF COM Detectors Calibrated by Resampling
4.2. Alternative Methods of Calibration
4.3. Totalling Colour Components

5. CONCLUSIONS

Saturday, August 21, 2010

Paper: A Method for Automatic Identification of Signatures of Steganography Software

Graeme Bell and Yeuan-Kuen Lee
IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
Volume 5, Issue 2 (June 2010) pp. 354 - 358.
( Original IEEE Xplore Link )

Abstract

A fully automated, blind, media-type agnostic approach to steganalysis is presented here. Steganography may sometimes be exposed by detecting automatically characterized regularities in output media caused by weak implementations of steganography algorithms. Fast and accurate detection of steganography is demonstrated experimentally here across a range of media types and a variety of steganography approaches.



From StegoRN

這篇論文在該本期刊的 Top Accessed Articles July 2010, 目前排名第 8 位, 還算不錯! (2010/08/21)

Thursday, August 19, 2010

News: 論文抄別人 博士碩士都沒了

(聯合新聞網 2010/08/18 記者饒磐安 台北縣報導 原始新聞連結 Yahoo 新聞網)

政大歷史研究所博士生張OO前年四月上網查資料,發現她的碩士論文遭林姓女博士生抄襲,因而提告,智慧財產權法院法官找中研院法律研究所專家鑑定,認定林女論文卅二處抄襲,林女因被撤銷碩士學位,和博士班入學資格。

智慧財產權法院法官依違反著作權法,判林女須賠償張女廿二萬元,並在報紙全國版下半版刊登判決書。

張OO是中研院獎助的培育博士生,她八年前在中正大學歷史研究所完成碩士論文「清代貞節的實踐及其困境」,論證貞節的實踐有「階級性」。

她前年四月上網查資料,在國家圖書館網站上竟發現中研院林姓女助理的碩士論文「情慾與社會秩序:從刑科題本看清代婦女的抉擇」,有多處抄自她的碩士論文;且林女將論文改寫成單篇專文「賦性宣淫:清乾隆朝強姦案之解讀」,刊登在東吳大學歷史系研究生學報創刊號,也有多處抄襲她的碩士論文。

張女說,她要求林女更正道歉,但林女不但毫不反省,反而稱類似事件在學術界很多,並不稀奇;學術之路漫長,希望她有「智慧」放手,無須為此事弄得「頭破血流」。她感到訝異,並認為林女若不更正及道歉,澄清是非,日後她的單篇專文反而被誤認是抄襲自林女,因此才提告。

林女則說,她並未故意抄襲,她和張女的論文論述不同,研究架構、研究目的及徵引文獻上都有差異,且引用論文未涉商業活動,並在張女告知此事的第一時間,撤回錯引的論文並更正論文內容,她的更正已確定張女的論文地位,她被撤銷碩士學位,也喪失博士班入學資格,已付出很大代價,盼法官不要再判她登報道歉。